A transdiagnostic meta-analysis of acute augmentations to psychological therapy

Author:

Nord Camilla L.ORCID,Longley Beth,Dercon QuentinORCID,Phillips VeronicaORCID,Funk Julia,Gormley Siobhan,Knight Rachel,Smith Alicia J.,Dalgleish TimORCID

Abstract

AbstractAt least half of all patients with mental health disorders do not respond adequately to psychological therapy. Acutely enhancing particular biological or psychological processes during psychological therapy may improve treatment outcomes. However, previous studies are confined to specific augmentation approaches, typically assessed within single diagnostic categories. Our objective was to assess to what degree acute augmentations of psychological therapy reduce psychiatric symptoms and estimate effect sizes of augmentation types (for example, brain stimulation or psychedelics). We searched Medline, PsycINFO and Embase for controlled studies published between database inception and 25 May 2022. We conducted a preregistered random-effects meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021236403). We identified 108 studies (N = 5,889). Acute augmentation significantly reduced the severity of mental health problems (Hedges’g = −0.27, 95% CI: [−0.36, −0.18];P < 0.0001), particularly for the transdiagnostic dimensions 'Fear' and 'Distress'. This result survived a trim-and-fill analysis to account for publication bias. Subgroup analyses revealed that pharmacological, psychological and somatic augmentations were effective, but to varying degrees. Acute augmentation approaches are a promising route to improve outcomes from psychological therapy.

Funder

RCUK | Medical Research Council

AXA Research Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference147 articles.

1. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders (WHO, 2017); http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/WHOMSD?sequence=1

2. O’Shea, N. & Bell, A. A Spending Review for Wellbeing (Centre for Mental Health, 2020); https://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/publication/download/CentreforMentalHealth_SpendingReviewForWellbeing.pdf

3. Ormel, J., Hollon, S. D., Kessler, R. C., Cuijpers, P. & Monroe, S. M. More treatment but no less depression: the treatment–prevalence paradox. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 91, 102111 (2021).

4. Lazar, S. G. & Gabbard, G. O. The cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy. J. Psychother. Pract. Res. 6, 307–314 (1997).

5. Zimmermann, G., Favrod, J., Trieu, V. & Pomini, V. The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on the positive symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Schizophr. Res. 77, 1–9 (2005).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3