Author:
Chadwick Andy,Smith Dan,Hodrien Chris,Hovorka Sue,Mackay Eric,Mathias Simon,Lovell Bryan,Kalaydjian Francois,Sweeney Graeme,Benson Sally,Dooley Jim,Davidson Casie
Abstract
AbstractIn a recent publication, Ehlig-Economides & Economides (2010) have sought to demonstrate that carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is not technically or economically feasible, based on a supposed lack of underground storage capacity. We consider this to be a serious misrepresentation of the scientific, engineering and operational facts surrounding CCS. Ehlig-Economides & Economides raise a number of storage related issues: reservoir boundaries, capacity, pressure management, storage integrity, dissolution and storage in depleted reservoirs. We take each one in turn, highlighting specific errors in the paper but also drawing attention to more general background issues. Finally, we discuss in more detail some inconsistencies in the paper surrounding the reservoir engineering calculations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献