Abstract
AbstractLearning about neural communication can be a dry and challenging undertaking, particularly for students without a background in biology. To enhance learning of this and other STEM material, there has been a call for science educators to embrace the use of active learning techniques. The aim of this Brief Communication is to encourage the use of embodied metaphors in the university classroom by sharing an active learning method for introducing students to a number of key concepts in neural communication. The students work in pairs or small groups, using foam projectiles such as Nerf guns to work through several metaphors for electrical and chemical processes including action potentials, neurotransmission and receptor action, excitatory and inhibitory post-synaptic potentials and neurotransmitter inactivation. The activities are easy to stage and lend themselves well to customisation based on available class size, classroom space, and resources. Student feedback showed that the activities improved self-reported impressions of understanding and ability to convey key concepts to others. The activities thus can serve as a useful method of student engagement and help develop understanding of complex material in a neuroscience classroom.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference14 articles.
1. Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8410–8415 (2014).
2. Prince, M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004).
3. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison J. A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement In The Classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1 (George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1991).
4. Anderson, R. C. Creative engagement: embodied metaphor, the affective brain, and meaningful learning. Mind Brain Educ. 12, 72–81 (2018).
5. Niebert, K., Marsch, S. & Treagust, D. F. Understanding needs embodiment: A theory‐guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Sci. Educ. 96, 849–877 (2012).