Quantitative Analysis for Estimating Binding Potential of the Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor with [11C]DAA1106

Author:

Ikoma Yoko1,Yasuno Fumihiko1,Ito Hiroshi1,Suhara Tetsuya1,Ota Miho12,Toyama Hinako3,Fujimura Yota14,Takano Akihiro1,Maeda Jun1,Zhang Ming-Rong56,Nakao Ryuji5,Suzuki Kazutoshi5

Affiliation:

1. Brain Imaging Project, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan

2. CIinicaI Neuroscience, Medical Sciences for Control of Pathological Processes, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

3. Department of Health Service Management, International University of Health and Welfare, Ohtawara, Japan

4. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

5. Department of Medical Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan

6. SHI Accelerator Service Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

[11C]DAA1106 is a potent and selective ligand for the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) with high affinity. It has been reported that the density of PBR is related to brain damage, so a reliable tracer method for the evaluation of PBR would be of use. We evaluated a quantification method of [11C]DAA1106 binding in simulated data and human brain data. In the simulation study, the reliability of parameters estimated from the nonlinear least-squares (NLS) method, graphical analysis (GA), and multilinear analysis (MA) was evaluated. In GA, variation of the estimated distribution volume (DV) was small. However, DV was underestimated as noise increased. In MA, bias was smaller, and variation of the estimated DV was larger than in GA. In NLS, although variation was larger than in GA, it was small enough in regions of interest analysis, and not only DV but also binding potential (BP), determined from the k3 /k4 without any constraint, could be estimated. The variation of BP estimated with NLS became larger as k3 or k4 became smaller. In human studies with normal volunteers, regions of interest were drawn on several brain regions, BP was calculated by NLS, and DV was also estimated by NLS, GA, and MA. As a result, DVs estimated with each method were well correlated. However, there was no correlation between BP with NLS and DV with NLS, GA, and MA, because of the variation of K1 /k2 between individuals. In conclusion, BP is estimated most reliably by NLS with the two-tissue compartment model.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3