Intersubject Variability and Reproducibility of 15O PET Studies

Author:

Coles Jonathan P12,Fryer Tim D2,Bradley Peter G12,Nortje Jurgens12,Smielewski Peter23,Rice Kenneth4,Clark John C2,Pickard John D23,Menon David K12

Affiliation:

1. The Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK

2. The Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK

4. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Oxygen-15 positron emission tomography (15O PET) can provide important data regarding patients with head injury. We provide reference data on intersubject variability and reproducibility of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolism (CMRO2) and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) in patients and healthy controls, and explored alternative ways of assessing reproducibility within the context of a single PET study. In addition, we used independent measurements of CBF and CMRO2 to investigate the effect of mathematical correlation on the relationship between flow and metabolism. In patients, intersubject coefficients of variation (CoV) for CBF, CMRO2 and OEF were larger than in controls (32.9% ± 2.2%, 23.2% ± 2.0% and 22.5% ± 3.4% versus 13.5% ± 1.4%, 12.8% ± 1.1% and 7.3% ± 1.2%), while CoV for CBV were lower (15.2% ± 2.1% versus 22.5%±2.8%) ( P>0.001). The CoV for the test—retest reproducibility of CBF, CBV, CMRO2 and OEF in patients were 2.1% ± 1.5%, 3.8% ± 3.0%, 3.7% ± 3.0% and 4.6% ± 3.5%, respectively. These were much lower than the intersubject CoV figures, and were similar to alternative measures of reproducibility obtained by fractionating data from a single study. The physiological relationship between flow and metabolism was preserved even when mathematically independent measures were used for analysis. These data provide a context for the design and interpretation of interventional PET studies. While ideally each centre should develop its own bank of such data, the figures provided will allow initial generic approximations of sample size for such studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3