Abstract
AbstractThe release of ChatGPT and related tools have made generative artificial intelligence (AI) easily accessible for the broader public. We conducted four preregistered experimental studies (total N = 3308; participants from the US) to investigate people’s perceptions of generative AI and the advice it generates on how to address societal and personal challenges. The results indicate that when individuals are (vs. are not) aware that the advice was generated by AI, they devalue the author’s competence but not the content or the intention to share and follow the advice on how to address societal challenges (Study 1) and personal challenges (Studies 2a and 2b). Study 3 further shows that individuals’ preference to receive advice from AI (vs. human experts) increases when they gained positive experience with generative AI advice in the past. The results are discussed regarding the nature of AI aversion in the context of generative AI and beyond.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Csathy, P. Chat GPT proves that AI could be a major threat to Hollywood creatives – and not just below the line | PRO Insight. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/chat-gpt-proves-ai-could-140000111.html (2022).
2. Duranton, S. ChatGPT — let the generative AI revolution begin https://www.forbes.com/sites/sylvainduranton/2023/01/07/chatgpt3let-the-generative-ai-revolution-begin/?sh=35a5186daf15 (2023).
3. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003).
4. Köbis, N. & Mossink, L. D. Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Comput. Human Behav. 114, 106553 (2021).
5. Clark, E. et al. All that’s ‘human’ is not gold: evaluating human evaluation of generated text. In ACL-IJCNLP 2021 - 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proc. Conference 7282–7296 https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.00061 (2021).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. In praise of empathic AI;Trends in Cognitive Sciences;2023-12