Benchmarking of survival outcomes following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A review of existing processes and the introduction of an international system from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)
-
Published:2019-10-21
Issue:4
Volume:55
Page:681-694
-
ISSN:0268-3369
-
Container-title:Bone Marrow Transplantation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Bone Marrow Transplant
Author:
Snowden John A.ORCID, Saccardi Riccardo, Orchard Kim, Ljungman PerORCID, Duarte Rafael F., Labopin Myriam, McGrath EoinORCID, Brook Nigel, de Elvira Carmen Ruiz, Gordon Debra, Poirel Hélène A.ORCID, Ayuk Francis, Beguin Yves, Bonifazi FrancescaORCID, Gratwohl Alois, Milpied Noel, Moore John, Passweg Jakob, Rizzo J. Douglas, Spellman Stephen R., Sierra Jorge, Solano Carlos, Sanchez-Guijo Fermin, Worel Nina, Gusi Andreu, Adams Gillian, Balan Theodor, Baldomero Helen, Macq Gilles, Marry Evelyne, Mesnil Florence, Oldani Elena, Pearce Rachel, Perry Julia, Raus Nicole, Schanz Urs, Tran Steven, Wilcox Leonie, Basak Grzegorz W.ORCID, Chabannon ChristianORCID, Corbacioglu Selim, Dolstra Harry, Kuball Jürgen, Mohty Mohamad, Lankester Arjan, Montoto Sylvia, Nagler Arnon, Styczynski Jan, Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim, de Latour Regis Peffault, Kroeger Nicolaus, Brand Ronald, de Wreede Liesbeth C., van Zwet Erik, Putter Hein
Abstract
AbstractIn many healthcare settings, benchmarking for complex procedures has become a mandatory requirement by competent authorities, regulators, payers and patients to assure clinical performance, cost-effectiveness and safe care of patients. In several countries inside and outside Europe, benchmarking systems have been established for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but access is not universal. As benchmarking is now integrated into the FACT-JACIE standards, the EBMT and JACIE established a Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) to develop and introduce a universal system accessible across EBMT members. Established systems from seven European countries (United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland), USA and Australia were appraised, revealing similarities in process, but wide variations in selection criteria and statistical methods. In tandem, the COG developed the first phase of a bespoke risk-adapted international benchmarking model for one-year survival following allogeneic and autologous HSCT based on current capabilities within the EBMT registry core dataset. Data completeness, which has a critical impact on validity of centre comparisons, is also assessed. Ongoing development will include further scientific validation of the model, incorporation of further variables (when appropriate) alongside implementation of systems for clinically meaningful interpretation and governance aiming to maximise acceptance to centres, clinicians, payers and patients across EBMT.
Funder
European Society for Blood & Marrow Transplantation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services EBMT
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Transplantation,Hematology
Reference30 articles.
1. Wind A, van Harten WH. Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:245. 2. Wind A, Gonçalves FR, Marosi E, da Pieve L, Groza M, Asioli M, et al. Benchmarking cancer centers: from care pathways to integrated practice units. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2018;16:1075–83. 3. Henneman D, Dekker JWT, Wouters MWJM, Fiocco M, Tollenaar RAEM. Benchmarking clinical outcomes in elective colorectal cancer surgery: The interplay between institutional reoperation- and mortality rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1429–35. 4. Stortz JA, Mira JC, Raymond SL, Loftus TJ, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Wang Z, et al. Benchmarking clinical outcomes and the immunocatabolic phenotype of chronic critical illness after sepsis in surgical intensive care unit patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;84:342–9. 5. Choi D, Crockard HA. How and why should we benchmark clinical outcomes and quality of life for surgery in spinal metastases? Br J Neurosurg 2009;23:3–4.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|