Why so little progress in regionalization of perinatal care when transport of high-risk neonates remains a substantial risk?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Why so little progress in regionalization of perinatal care when transport of high-risk neonates remains a substantial risk?

Published:2020-01-29 Issue:3 Volume:40 Page:357-358
ISSN:0743-8346
Container-title:Journal of Perinatology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Perinatol

Author:

Bizzarro Matthew J.,Gallagher Patrick G.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

http://www.nature.com/articles/s41372-020-0600-x.pdf

Reference15 articles.

1. Butterfield L. The impact of regionalization on neonatal outcome. In: Smith GF, Vidyasagar D, editors. Volume 2 historical review and recent advances in neonatal and perinatal medicine. Evansville, IN: Mead Johnson Nutritional Division; 1980.

2. American Academy of Pediatrics Pediatric History Center: Oral History Project: L Joseph Butterfield, Interviewed by Russel Nelson, June 24 1997.

3. March of Dimes, Committee on Perinatal Health. Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy: recommendations for the regional development of maternal and perinatal health services. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes National Foundation; 1976.

4. Simpson JB. State certificate-of-need programs: the current status. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:1225–29.

5. Holmstrom ST, Phibbs CS. Regionalization and mortality in neonatal intensive care. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56:617–30.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. NICUs in the US: levels of acuity, number of beds, and relationships to population factors;Journal of Perinatology;2023-05-19

2. Summary of neonatal and maternal transport and reimbursement policies—a 5-year update;Journal of Perinatology;2022-04-12