Author:
Krogh Søren,Aagaard Per,Jønsson Anette Bach,Figlewski Krystian,Kasch Helge
Abstract
Abstract
Study design
Randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.
Objectives
The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared to sham stimulation, on the development of lower limb muscle strength and gait function during rehabilitation of spinal cord injury (SCI).
Setting
SCI rehabilitation hospital in Viborg, Denmark.
Methods
Twenty individuals with SCI were randomized to receive rTMS (REAL, n = 11) or sham stimulation (SHAM, n = 9) and usual care for 4 weeks. rTMS (20 Hz, 1800 pulses per session) or sham stimulation was delivered over leg M1 Monday–Friday before lower limb resistance training or physical therapy. Lower limb maximal muscle strength (MVC) and gait function were assessed pre- and post intervention. Lower extremity motor score (LEMS) was assessed at admission and at discharge.
Results
One individual dropped out due to seizure. More prominent increases in total leg (effect size (ES): 0.40), knee flexor (ES: 0.29), and knee extensor MVC (ES: 0.34) were observed in REAL compared to SHAM; however, repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no clear main effects for any outcome measure (treatment p > 0.15, treatment × time p > 0.76, time p > 0.23). LEMS improved significantly for REAL at discharge, but not for SHAM, and REAL demonstrated greater improvement in LEMS than SHAM (p < 0.02). Similar improvements in gait performance were observed between groups.
Conclusions
High-frequency rTMS may increase long-term training-induced recovery of lower limb muscle strength following SCI. The effect on short-term recovery is unclear. Four weeks of rTMS, when delivered in conjunction with resistance training, has no effect on recovery of gait function, indicating a task-specific training effect.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:552–7.
2. Dijkers MPJM. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:867–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90076-X.
3. Riggins MS, Kankipati P, Oyster ML, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. The relationship between quality of life and change in mobility 1 year postinjury in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1027–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.010.
4. Crozier KS, Cheng LL, Graziani V, Zorn G, Herbison G, Ditunno JF. Spinal cord injury: Prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Paraplegia. 1992;30:762–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1992.147.
5. Kim CM, Eng JJ, Whittaker MW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:156–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101569.