Validity and reliability study of a novel surface electromyography sensor using a well-consolidated electromyography system in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury

Abstract

Abstract Study design Non-interventional, cross-sectional pilot study. Objectives To establish the validity and reliability of the BioStamp nPoint biosensor (Medidata Solutions, New York, NY, USA [formerly MC10, Inc.]) for measuring electromyography in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) by comparing the surface electromyography (sEMG) metrics with the Trigno wireless electromyography system (Delsys, Natick, MA, USA). Setting Participants were recruited from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab registry. Methods Individuals aged 18–70 years with cervical SCI were evaluated with the two biosensors to capture activity on upper-extremity muscles during two study sessions conducted over 2 days (day 1–consent alone; day 2–two data collections in same session). Time and frequency metrics were captured, and signal-to-noise ratio was determined for each muscle group. Test-retest reliability was determined using Pearson’s correlation. Validation of the BioStamp nPoint system was based on Bland-Altmann analysis. Results Among the 11 participants, 30.8% had subacute cervical injury at C5–C6; 53.8% were injured within 1 year of the study. Results from the test-retest reliability assessment revealed that most Pearson’s correlations between the two sensory measurements were strong (≥0.50). The Bland-Altman analysis found values of the signal-to-noise ratio, frequency, and peak amplitude were within the level of agreement. Signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 7.06 to 22.1. Conclusions In most instances, the performance of the BioStamp nPoint sensors was moderately to strongly correlated with that of the Trigno sensors in all muscle groups tested. The BioStamp nPoint system is a valid and reliable approach to assess sEMG measures in individuals with cervical SCI. Sponsorship The present study was supported by AbbVie Inc.