Abstract
AbstractDisability progression in multiple sclerosis remains resistant to treatment. The absence of a suitable biomarker to allow for phase 2 clinical trials presents a high barrier for drug development. We propose to enable short proof-of-concept trials by increasing statistical power using a deep-learning predictive enrichment strategy. Specifically, a multi-headed multilayer perceptron is used to estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) using baseline clinical and imaging features, and patients predicted to be most responsive are preferentially randomized into a trial. Leveraging data from six randomized clinical trials (n = 3,830), we first pre-trained the model on the subset of relapsing-remitting MS patients (n = 2,520), then fine-tuned it on a subset of primary progressive MS (PPMS) patients (n = 695). In a separate held-out test set of PPMS patients randomized to anti-CD20 antibodies or placebo (n = 297), the average treatment effect was larger for the 50% (HR, 0.492; 95% CI, 0.266-0.912; p = 0.0218) and 30% (HR, 0.361; 95% CI, 0.165-0.79; p = 0.008) predicted to be most responsive, compared to 0.743 (95% CI, 0.482-1.15; p = 0.179) for the entire group. The same model could also identify responders to laquinimod in another held-out test set of PPMS patients (n = 318). Finally, we show that using this model for predictive enrichment results in important increases in power.
Funder
Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
International Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Alliance
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference47 articles.
1. Kappos, L. et al. Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 77, 1132–1140 (2020).
2. Temple, R. Enrichment of clinical study populations. Clin. Pharmacol. therapeutics 88, 774–778 (2010).
3. Bovis, F. et al. Defining responders to therapies by a statistical modeling approach applied to randomized clinical trial data. BMC Med. 17, 1–10 (2019).
4. Gutierrez, P. & Gérardy, J.-Y. Causal inference and uplift modelling: a review of the literature. In Hardgrove, C., Dorard, L., Thompson, K. & Douetteau, F. (ed.) Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Predictive Applications and APIs, PMLR Vol 67, 1–13 (PMLR, 2017).
5. Athey, S. & Imbens, G. Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 7353–7360 (2016).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献