Abstract
AbstractThe discovery of scientific formulae that parsimoniously explain natural phenomena and align with existing background theory is a key goal in science. Historically, scientists have derived natural laws by manipulating equations based on existing knowledge, forming new equations, and verifying them experimentally. However, this does not include experimental data within the discovery process, which may be inefficient. We propose a solution to this problem when all axioms and scientific laws are expressible as polynomials and argue our approach is widely applicable. We model notions of minimal complexity using binary variables and logical constraints, solve polynomial optimization problems via mixed-integer linear or semidefinite optimization, and prove the validity of our scientific discoveries in a principled manner using Positivstellensatz certificates. We demonstrate that some famous scientific laws, including Kepler’s Law of Planetary Motion and the Radiated Gravitational Wave Power equation, can be derived in a principled manner from axioms and experimental data.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. De Regt, H. W. Understanding, values, and the aims of science. Philos. Sci. 87, 921–932 (2020).
2. Simon, H. A. Does scientific discovery have a logic? Philos. Sci. 40, 471–480 (1973).
3. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D. & Syverson, C. Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, 23–57 (University of Chicago Press, 2018).
4. Bhattacharya, J. & Packalen, M. Stagnation and scientific incentives. Tech. Rep., National Bureau of Economic Research (2020).
5. Dirac, P. A. Directions in Physics. Lectures delivered during a visit to Australia and New Zealand, August/September 1975 (1978).