Abstract
AbstractHow do biological networks evolve and expand? We study these questions in the context of the plant collaborative-non-self recognition self-incompatibility system. Self-incompatibility evolved to avoid self-fertilization among hermaphroditic plants. It relies on specific molecular recognition between highly diverse proteins of two families: female and male determinants, such that the combination of genes an individual possesses determines its mating partners. Though highly polymorphic, previous models struggled to pinpoint the evolutionary trajectories by which new specificities evolved. Here, we construct a novel theoretical framework, that crucially affords interaction promiscuity and multiple distinct partners per protein, as is seen in empirical findings disregarded by previous models. We demonstrate spontaneous self-organization of the population into distinct “classes” with full between-class compatibility and a dynamic long-term balance between class emergence and decay. Our work highlights the importance of molecular recognition promiscuity to network evolvability. Promiscuity was found in additional systems suggesting that our framework could be more broadly applicable.
Funder
Israel Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40 (1985).
2. East, E. M. & Mangelsdorf, A. J. A new interpretation of the hereditary behavior of self-sterile plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11, 166–171 (1925).
3. Wright, S. The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations. Genetics 24, 538–552 (1939).
4. de Nettancourt, D. (ed.) The genetic basis of self-incompatibility. in Incompatibility in Angiosperms, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 28–57 (Springer, 1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12051-4_2.
5. Igic, B., Lande, R. & Kohn, J. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 93–104 (2008).