Abstract
AbstractOne key aspect of domain-general thought is the ability to integrate information across different cognitive domains. Here, we tested whether kea (Nestor notabilis) can use relative quantities when predicting sampling outcomes, and then integrate both physical information about the presence of a barrier, and social information about the biased sampling of an experimenter, into their predictions. Our results show that kea exhibit three signatures of statistical inference, and therefore can integrate knowledge across different cognitive domains to flexibly adjust their predictions of sampling events. This result provides evidence that true statistical inference is found outside of the great apes, and that aspects of domain-general thinking can convergently evolve in brains with a highly different structure from primates. This has important implications not only for our understanding of how intelligence evolves, but also for research focused on how to create artificial domain-general thought processes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference81 articles.
1. Shettleworth, S. J. Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness. Philos. Trans. 367, 2794–2802 (2012).
2. Shettleworth, S. J. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010).
3. Duchaine, B., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 225–230 (2001).
4. Carroll, J. B. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
5. Horn, J. L. & Cattell, R. B. Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychol. 26, 107–129 (1967).
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献