A machine learning toolkit for genetic engineering attribution to facilitate biosecurity

Author:

Alley Ethan C.ORCID,Turpin Miles,Liu Andrew Bo,Kulp-McDowall Taylor,Swett Jacob,Edison Rey,Von Stetina Stephen E.,Church George M.,Esvelt Kevin M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe promise of biotechnology is tempered by its potential for accidental or deliberate misuse. Reliably identifying telltale signatures characteristic to different genetic designers, termed ‘genetic engineering attribution’, would deter misuse, yet is still considered unsolved. Here, we show that recurrent neural networks trained on DNA motifs and basic phenotype data can reach 70% attribution accuracy in distinguishing between over 1,300 labs. To make these models usable in practice, we introduce a framework for weighing predictions against other investigative evidence using calibration, and bring our model to within 1.6% of perfect calibration. Additionally, we demonstrate that simple models can accurately predict both the nation-state-of-origin and ancestor labs, forming the foundation of an integrated attribution toolkit which should promote responsible innovation and international security alike.

Funder

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry

Reference59 articles.

1. Engelberg, S. New evidence adds doubt to FBI’s case against anthrax suspect—ProPublica. ProPublica https://www.propublica.org/article/new-evidence-disputes-case-against-bruce-e-ivins (2011).

2. Skane, W. Science alone does not establish source of anthrax used in 2001 mailings. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=13098 (2011).

3. Cummings, C. A. & Relman, D. A. Microbial forensics-‘cross-examining pathogens’. Science 296, 1976–1979 (2002).

4. Budowle, B. et al. Building microbial forensics as a response to bioterrorism. Science 301, 1852–1853 (2003).

5. Shane, S. & Wade, N. Pressure grows for F.B.I.’s anthrax evidence. NY Times (2008).

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3