Abstract
Abstract
The accurate representation of data is essential in science communication. However, colour maps that visually distort data through uneven colour gradients or are unreadable to those with colour-vision deficiency remain prevalent in science. These include, but are not limited to, rainbow-like and red–green colour maps. Here, we present a simple guide for the scientific use of colour. We show how scientifically derived colour maps report true data variations, reduce complexity, and are accessible for people with colour-vision deficiencies. We highlight ways for the scientific community to identify and prevent the misuse of colour in science, and call for a proactive step away from colour misuse among the community, publishers, and the press.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference65 articles.
1. Akiyama, K. et al. First M87 event horizon telescope results. IV. Imaging the central supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L4 (2019).
2. Long, E. Election Data Visualisation (University of Plymouth, 2013).
3. Cox, A., Bostock, M., Watkins, D. & Shan, C. The Most Detailed Maps You’ll See from the Midterm Elections.,
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/11/04/upshot/senate-maps.html
(2014).
4. Lemoine, F. G. et al. An improved solution of the gravity field of Mars (GMM-2B) from Mars Global Surveyor. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets 106, 23359–23376 (2001).
5. Hawkins, E. Scrap rainbow colour scales. Nature 519, 291 EP (2015).
Cited by
497 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献