Improving the representativeness of UK’s national COVID-19 Infection Survey through spatio-temporal regression and post-stratification
-
Published:2024-06-24
Issue:1
Volume:15
Page:
-
ISSN:2041-1723
-
Container-title:Nature Communications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Commun
Author:
Pouwels Koen B.ORCID, Eyre David W.ORCID, House ThomasORCID, Aspey Ben, Matthews Philippa C., Stoesser NicoleORCID, Newton John N.ORCID, Diamond Ian, Studley Ruth, Taylor Nick G. H., Bell John I., Farrar Jeremy, Kolenchery Jaison, Marsden Brian D.ORCID, Hoosdally Sarah, Jones E. YvonneORCID, Stuart David I., Crook Derrick W., Peto Tim E. A., Walker A. Sarah, , Wei Jia, Pritchard Emma, Vihta Karina-Doris, Doherty George, Kavanagh James, Chau Kevin K., Hatch Stephanie B., Ebner Daniel, Ferreira Lucas Martins, Christott Thomas, Dejnirattisai Wanwisa, Mongkolsapaya Juthathip, Cameron Sarah, Tamblin-Hopper Phoebe, Wolna Magda, Brown Rachael, Cornall Richard, Screaton Gavin, Lythgoe Katrina, Bonsall David, Golubchik Tanya, Fryer Helen, Thomas Tina, Ayoubkhani Daniel, Black Russell, Felton Antonio, Crees Megan, Jones Joel, Lloyd Lina, Sutherland Esther, Cox Stuart, Paddon Kevin, James Tim, Robotham Julie V., Birrell Paul, Jordan Helena, Sheppard Tim, Athey Graham, Moody Dan, Curry Leigh, Brereton Pamela, Jarvis Ian, Godsmark Anna, Morris George, Mallick Bobby, Eeles Phil, Hay Jodie, VanSteenhouse Harper, Lee Jessica, White Sean, Evans Tim, Bloemberg Lisa, Allison Katie, Pandya Anouska, Davis Sophie, Conway David I., MacLeod Margaret, Cunningham Chris
Abstract
AbstractPopulation-representative estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence and antibody levels in specific geographic areas at different time points are needed to optimise policy responses. However, even population-wide surveys are potentially impacted by biases arising from differences in participation rates across key groups. Here, we used spatio-temporal regression and post-stratification models to UK’s national COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) to obtain representative estimates of PCR positivity (6,496,052 tests) and antibody prevalence (1,941,333 tests) for different regions, ages and ethnicities (7-December-2020 to 4-May-2022). Not accounting for vaccination status through post-stratification led to small underestimation of PCR positivity, but more substantial overestimations of antibody levels in the population (up to 21 percentage points), particularly in groups with low vaccine uptake in the general population. There was marked variation in the relative contribution of different areas and age-groups to each wave. Future analyses of infectious disease surveys should take into account major drivers of outcomes of interest that may also influence participation, with vaccination being an important factor to consider.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int (2022). 2. Pouwels, K. B. et al. Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England from April to November, 2020: results from the ONS Coronavirus infection survey. Lancet Public Health 6, e30–e38 (2021). 3. Sah, P. et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109229118 (2021). 4. Nicholson, G. et al. Improving local prevalence estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infections using a causal debiasing framework. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 97–107 (2022). 5. Gao, Y., Kennedy, L., Simpson, D. & Gelman, A. Improving multilevel regression and poststratification with structured priors. Bayesian Anal. 16, 719–744 (2021).
|
|