Abstract
AbstractThe goal of deliberation is to separate between options so that we can commit to one and leave the other behind. However, deliberation can, paradoxically, also form an association in memory between the chosen and unchosen options. Here, we consider this possibility and examine its consequences for how outcomes affect not only the value of the options we chose, but also, by association, the value of options we did not choose. In five experiments (total n = 612), including a preregistered experiment (n = 235), we found that the value assigned to unchosen options is inversely related to their chosen counterparts. Moreover, this inverse relationship was associated with participants’ memory of the pairs they chose between. Our findings suggest that deciding between options does not end the competition between them. Deliberation binds choice options together in memory such that the learned value of one can affect the inferred value of the other.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference82 articles.
1. Roese, N. J. Counterfactual thinking. Psychol. Bull. 121, 133–148 (1997).
2. Zeelenberg, M. et al. Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: the role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 75, 117–141 (1998).
3. Kahneman, D. in What might have been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking (eds Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M.) 375–396 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1995).
4. Gilovich, T. & Medvec, V. H. The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychol. Rev. 102, 379 (1995).
5. Connolly, T. & Zeelenberg, M. Regret in decision making. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 212–216 (2003).
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献