Abstract
AbstractSexual signal design is an evolutionary puzzle that has been partially solved by the hypothesis of sensory drive. Framed in signal detection theory, sensory drive posits that the attractiveness of a signal depends on its detectability, measured as contrast with the background. Yet, cognitive scientists have shown that humans prefer images that match the spatial statistics of natural scenes. The explanation is framed in information theory, whereby attractiveness is determined by the efficiency of information processing. Here, we apply this framework to animals, using Fourier analysis to compare the spatial statistics of body patterning in ten species of darters (Etheostoma spp.) with those of their respective habitats. We find a significant correlation between the spatial statistics of darter patterns and those of their habitats for males, but not for females. Our results support a sensory drive hypothesis that recognizes efficient information processing as a driving force in signal evolution.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference74 articles.
1. Andersson, M. B. Sexual Selection. (Princeton University Press, 1994).
2. Cummings, M. E. & Endler, J. A. 25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias. Curr. Zool. 64, 471–484 (2018).
3. Seehausen, O. et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455, 620–626 (2008).
4. Endler, J. A. & Basolo, A. L. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415–420 (1998).
5. Ryan, M. J. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157–195 (1990).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献