Abstract
AbstractNatural selection generally favours phenotypic variability in camouflaged organisms, whereas aposematic organisms are expected to evolve a more uniform warning coloration. However, no comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic consequences of predator selection in aposematic and cryptic species exists. Using state-of-the-art image analysis, we examine 2800 wing images of 82 moth species accessed via three online museum databases. We test whether anti-predator strategy (i.e., camouflage or aposematism) explains intraspecific variation in wing colour and pattern across northern hemisphere moths. In addition, we test two mutually non-exclusive, ecological hypotheses to explain variation in colour pattern: diel-activity or dietary-niche. In this work, taking into account phylogenetic relationships, moth phenotypic variability is best explained by anti-predator strategy with camouflaged moths being more variable in wing patterning than aposematic species.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference105 articles.
1. Bates, H. W. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 23, 495–556 (1862).
2. Müller, F. Ituna and Thyridia: a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1879, 20–29 (1879).
3. Poulton, E. B. The Colours of Animals: Their Meaning and Use, Especially Considered in The Case of Insects (D. Appleton, 1890).
4. Dowdy, N. J. & Conner, W. E. Acoustic aposematism and evasive action in select chemically defended arctiine (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) species: nonchalant or not? PLoS ONE 11, 1–20 (2016).
5. Ratcliffe, J. M. & Nydam, M. L. Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world. Nature 455, 96–100 (2008).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献