The evolution of democratic peace in animal societies

Author:

Hunt K. L.ORCID,Patel M.ORCID,Croft D. P.ORCID,Franks D. W.,Green P. A.,Thompson F. J.ORCID,Johnstone R. A.,Cant M. A.ORCID,Sankey D. W. E.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractA major goal in evolutionary biology is to elucidate common principles that drive human and other animal societies to adopt either a warlike or peaceful nature. One proposed explanation for the variation in aggression between human societies is the democratic peace hypothesis. According to this theory, autocracies are more warlike than democracies because autocratic leaders can pursue fights for private gain. However, autocratic and democratic decision-making processes are not unique to humans and are widely observed across a diverse range of non-human animal societies. We use evolutionary game theory to evaluate whether the logic of democratic peace may apply across taxa; specifically adapting the classic Hawk-Dove model to consider conflict decisions made by groups rather than individuals. We find support for the democratic peace hypothesis without mechanisms involving complex human institutions and discuss how these findings might be relevant to non-human animal societies. We suggest that the degree to which collective decisions are shared may explain variation in the intensity of intergroup conflict in nature.

Funder

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference78 articles.

1. Choi, J.-K. & Bowles, S. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318, 636–640 (2007).

2. Gat, A. War in Human Civilisation. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).

3. Keeley, L. H. War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).

4. Rummel, R. J. Death by Government. (Transaction Publishers, 1997).

5. Allen, M. W., Bettinger, R. L., Codding, B. F., Jones, T. L. & Schwitalla, A. W. Resource scarcity drives lethal aggression among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 12120–12125 (2016).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3