Abstract
AbstractThe UK NHS Women’s National Breast Screening programme aims to detect breast cancer early. The reference standard approach requires mammograms to be independently double-read by qualified radiology staff. If two readers disagree, arbitration by an independent reader is undertaken. Whilst this process maximises accuracy and minimises recall rates, the procedure is labour-intensive, adding pressure to a system currently facing a workforce crisis. Artificial intelligence technology offers an alternative to human readers. While artificial intelligence has been shown to be non-inferior versus human second readers, the minimum requirements needed (effectiveness, set-up costs, maintenance, etc) for such technology to be cost-effective in the NHS have not been evaluated. We developed a simulation model replicating NHS screening services to evaluate the potential value of the technology. Our results indicate that if non-inferiority is maintained, the use of artificial intelligence technology as a second reader is a viable and potentially cost-effective use of NHS resources.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference30 articles.
1. World Cancer Research Fund International. Breast cancer statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer-statistics/ (2021).
2. Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer statistics. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer (2021).
3. Gray, E. et al. Evaluation of a stratified national breast screening program in the United Kingdom: an early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Value Health 20, 1100–1109 (Elsevier Inc., 2017).
4. Pharoah, P. Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model. BMJ 346, f2618 (2013).
5. Kregting, L. M., Sankatsing, V. D. V., Heijnsdijk, E. A. M., de Koning, H. J. & van Ravesteyn, N. T. Finding the optimal mammography screening strategy: a cost-effectiveness analysis of 920 modelled strategies. Int. J. Cancer 151, 287–296 (2022).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献