Abstract
AbstractOver the past decades, the Arctic has been warming more than any other region in the world with profound socio-economic consequences. One of the key elements for understanding this rapid climate change is the surface energy budget. However, in the Arctic this budget is not consistently described across the various climate models, reanalyses and observation products. Recognising the physical causes of these inconsistencies is highly relevant for improving climate predictions and projections. Here we show that a 5 to 10 °C warm bias of the sea-ice surface temperature in global atmospheric reanalyses and weather forecasts is mainly caused by a missing representation of the snow layer on top of the sea-ice. Due to the low thermal conductivity of snow compared to sea-ice, a thin snow layer reduces the conductive heat flux much more efficiently than sea-ice, and thus insulates the cold atmosphere from the relatively warm ocean.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference28 articles.
1. Emmerson, C. & Lahn, G. Arctic opening: opportunity and risk in the high north Chatham House-Lloydas Risk Insight Report (2012).
2. Boeke, R. C. & Taylor, P. C. Evaluation of the Arctic surface radiation budget in CMIP5 models. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 8525–8548 (2016).
3. Jung, T. et al. Advancing polar prediction capabilities on daily to seasonal time scales. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 97, 1631–1647 (2016).
4. Sorteberg, A. Kattsov, V. Walsh, J. & Pavlova, T. The Arctic surface energy budget as simulated with the IPCC AR4 AOGCMs. Clim. Dyn. 29, 131–156 (2007).
5. Tjernström, M. & Graversen, R. G. The vertical structure of the lower Arctic troposphere analysed from observations and the ERA-40 reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 431–443 (2009).
Cited by
73 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献