Abstract
AbstractGravity currents, such as sediment-laden turbidity currents, are ubiquitous natural flows that are driven by a density difference. Turbidity currents have provided vital motivation to advance understanding of this class of flows because their enigmatic long run-out and driving mechanisms are not properly understood. Extant models assume that material transport by gravity currents is dynamically similar to fluvial flows. Here, empirical research from different types of particle-driven gravity currents is integrated with our experimental data, to show that material transport is fundamentally different from fluvial systems. Contrary to current theory, buoyancy production is shown to have a non-linear dependence on available flow power, indicating an underestimation of the total kinetic energy lost from the mean flow. A revised energy budget directly implies that the mixing efficiency of gravity currents is enhanced.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference60 articles.
1. Simpson, J. E. Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
2. Meiburg, E. & Kneller, B. Turbidity currents and their deposits. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 135–156 (2010).
3. Wells, M. G. & Dorrell, R. M. Turbulence processes within turbidity currents. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060309 (2021).
4. Weimer, P. et al. Introduction to the Petroleum Geology of Deepwater Setting, Vol. 111 (AAPG/Datapages Tulsa, 2007).
5. Picot, M. et al. Monsoon control on channel avulsions in the Late Quaternary Congo Fan. Quat. Sci. Rev. 204, 149–171 (2019).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献