Abstract
AbstractIn recent years it has been shown that silent mutations, in and out of the coding region, can affect gene expression and may be related to tumorigenesis and cancer cell fitness. However, the predictive ability of these mutations for cancer type diagnosis and prognosis has not been evaluated yet. In the current study, based on the analysis of 9,915 cancer genomes and approximately three million mutations, we provide a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the predictive power of various types of silent and non-silent mutations over cancer classification and prognosis. The results indicate that silent-mutation models outperform the equivalent null models in classifying all examined cancer types and in estimating the probability of survival 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Additionally, combining both non-silent and silent mutations achieved the best classification results for 68% of the cancer types and the best survival estimation results for up to nine years after the diagnosis. Thus, silent mutations hold considerable predictive power over both cancer classification and prognosis, most likely due to their effect on gene expression. It is highly advised that silent mutations are integrated in cancer research in order to unravel the full genomic landscape of cancer and its ramifications on cancer fitness.
Funder
the Zimin Institute for Engineering Solutions Advancing Better Lives.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology
Reference90 articles.
1. Meyerson, M., Gabriel, S. & Getz, G. Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 685–696 (2010).
2. Nakagawa, H. & Fujita, M. Whole genome sequencing analysis for cancer genomics and precision medicine. Cancer Sci. 109, (2018).
3. Nangalia, J. & Campbell, P. Genome Sequencing during a Patient’s Journey through Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med 381, 2145–2156 (2019).
4. Schuster, S. Next-generation sequencing transforms today’s biology. Nat. Methods 5, 16–18 (2008).
5. Stephens, Z. et al. Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? PLoS Biol. 13, e1002195 (2015).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献