Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population
-
Published:2023-05-26
Issue:1
Volume:8
Page:
-
ISSN:2056-7944
-
Container-title:npj Genomic Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:npj Genom. Med.
Author:
Slavotinek Anne, Rego Shannon, Sahin-Hodoglugil Nuriye, Kvale Mark, Lianoglou Billie, Yip Tiffany, Hoban Hannah, Outram Simon, Anguiano Beatrice, Chen Flavia, Michelson JeremyORCID, Cilio Roberta M., Curry Cynthia, Gallagher Renata C.ORCID, Gardner Marisa, Kuperman Rachel, Mendelsohn Bryce, Sherr Elliott, Shieh JosephORCID, Strober Jonathan, Tam AllisonORCID, Tenney Jessica, Weiss William, Whittle Amy, Chin Garrett, Faubel Amanda, Prasad Hannah, Mavura Yusuph, Van Ziffle Jessica, Devine W. Patrick, Hodoglugil Ugur, Martin Pierre-Marie, Sparks Teresa N.ORCID, Koenig Barbara, Ackerman Sara, Risch Neil, Kwok Pui-Yan, Norton Mary E.
Abstract
AbstractThe diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) has primarily been evaluated in individuals of European ancestry, with less focus on underrepresented minority (URM) and underserved (US) patients. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of ES in a cohort of predominantly US and URM pediatric and prenatal patients suspected to have a genetic disorder. Eligible pediatric patients had multiple congenital anomalies and/or neurocognitive disabilities and prenatal patients had one or more structural anomalies, disorders of fetal growth, or fetal effusions. URM and US patients were prioritized for enrollment and underwent ES at a single academic center. We identified definitive positive or probable positive results in 201/845 (23.8%) patients, with a significantly higher diagnostic rate in pediatric (26.7%) compared to prenatal patients (19.0%) (P = 0.01). For both pediatric and prenatal patients, the diagnostic yield and frequency of inconclusive findings did not differ significantly between URM and non-URM patients or between patients with US status and those without US status. Our results demonstrate a similar diagnostic yield of ES between prenatal and pediatric URM/US patients and non-URM/US patients for positive and inconclusive results. These data support the use of ES to identify clinically relevant variants in patients from diverse populations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology
Reference41 articles.
1. Dolk, H., Loane, M. & Garne, E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 686, 349–364 (2010). 2. Alwan, A. & Modell, B. Recommendations for introducing genetics services in developing countries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 61–68 (2003). 3. Christianson, A. & Modell, B. Medical genetics in developing countries. Annu Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 5, 219–265 (2004). 4. Kingsmore, S. F. et al. Next-generation community genetics for low- and middle-income countries. Genome Med. 4, 25 (2012). 5. Srivastava, S. et al. Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet. Med. 21, 2413–2421 (2019).
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|