Abstract
AbstractTraditional statistical methods (TSM) and machine learning (ML) methods have been widely used to separate the effects of emissions and meteorology on air pollutant concentrations, while their performance compared to the chemistry transport model has been less fully investigated. Using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) as a reference, a series of experiments was conducted to comprehensively investigate the performance of TSM (e.g., multiple linear regression and Kolmogorov–Zurbenko filter) and ML (e.g., random forest and extreme gradient boosting) approaches in quantifying the effects of emissions and meteorology on the trends of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) during 2013−2017. Model performance evaluation metrics suggested that the TSM and ML methods can explain the variations of PM2.5 with the highest performance from ML. The trends of PM2.5 showed insignificant differences (p > 0.05) for both the emission-related ($${{\rm{PM}}}_{2.5}^{{\rm{EMI}}}$$
PM
2.5
EMI
) and meteorology-related components between TSM, ML, and CMAQ modeling results. $${{\rm{PM}}}_{2.5}^{{\rm{EMI}}}$$
PM
2.5
EMI
estimated from ML showed the least difference to that from CMAQ. Considering the medium computing resources and low model biases, the ML method is recommended for weather normalization of PM2.5. Sensitivity analysis further suggested that the ML model with optimized hyperparameters and the exclusion of temporal variables in weather normalization can further produce reasonable results in emission-related trends of PM2.5.
Funder
National Science Foundation of China | Key Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change
Reference78 articles.
1. Cheng, Z. et al. Status and characteristics of ambient PM2.5 pollution in global megacities. Environ. Int. 89–90, 212–221 (2016).
2. Shaddick, G., Thomas, M. L., Mudu, P., Ruggeri, G. & Gumy, S. Half the world’s population are exposed to increasing air pollution. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 3, 23 (2020).
3. Sicard, P. et al. Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: a global perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 160064 (2023).
4. World Health Organization. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. (World Health Organization, 2016).
5. World Health Organization. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide: Executive Summary. (World Health Organization, 2021).