Upstroke time is a more useful marker of atherosclerosis than percentage of mean arterial pressure for detecting coronary artery disease in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index

Author:

Maruhashi Tatsuya,Kajikawa Masato,Kishimoto Shinji,Yamaji Takayuki,Harada Takahiro,Hashimoto Yu,Mizobuchi Aya,Tanigawa Shunsuke,Yusoff Farina Mohamad,Nakano Yukiko,Chayama Kazuaki,Nakashima Ayumu,Goto Chikara,Higashi Yukihito

Abstract

AbstractUpstroke time (UT) and percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP) at the ankle have been shown to serve as atherosclerotic markers. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of UT with that of %MAP for clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) in both legs. We measured UT and %MAP in 1953 subjects with a normal ABI. The optimal cutoff values of UT and %MAP derived from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to diagnose CAD were 148 ms and 40.4%, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed that both UT ≥ 148 ms (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; p < 0.001) and %MAP ≥ 40.4% (OR, 1.28; p = 0.003) were significantly associated with CAD. When the subjects were divided into four groups according to the cutoff values of UT and %MAP, there was no significant difference in the risk of CAD between subjects with UT ≥ 148 ms and %MAP < 40.4% and those with UT ≥ 148 ms and %MAP ≥ 40.4% (OR, 1.45; p = 0.09). ROC curve analyses revealed that the area under the curve value of UT was significantly higher than that of %MAP (0.69 vs. 0.53, p < 0.001). The addition of UT to traditional risk factors significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for CAD (0.82 to 0.84, p = 0.004), whereas the addition of %MAP to traditional risk factors did not improve the diagnostic accuracy for CAD (0.82 to 0.82, p = 0.84). UT is more useful than %MAP for identifying individuals with CAD among those with a normal ABI.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3