Author:
Tenguri Prabhulinga,Kranthi Sandhya,Naik Chinna Babu,Mari Amutha,Kumar Rishi,Suke Ruchika,Nagrare Vishlesh Shankar,Narkhedkar Nandini Gokte,Waghmare Vijay Namdeo,Prasad Yenumula Gerard
Abstract
AbstractIndia is the world’s largest cotton producer and the only country that grows all four cultivated cotton species. There have been very few studies on the diversity and abundance of natural enemies of cotton insect pests in these cultivated cotton species. Therefore, the current study (2016–2018) was conducted to assess the diversity and abundance of natural enemies that cultivated cotton species harbour. Phule Dhanwantari, Suraj, Suvin, RCH-2, and DCH-32 were the five genotypes used in the study, each with a distinct genetic background. Using the adiv 2.0.1 and vegan R packages, we identified significant differences in natural enemies in terms of species diversity, richness, evenness, and abundance. Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) and Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) indicated substantial differences in the natural enemy community structure among the examined genotypes. A total of 17,279 natural enemies were collected and identified across genotypes from seven predatory families and five parasitoid families. The percentage share of these natural enemy families across genotypes and years, in descending order, is Coccinellidae (28.23%) < Tachinidae (19.23%) < Braconidae (12.68%) < Chrysopidae (11.65%) < Chalcididae (9.41%) < Aphelinidae (6.33%) < Pentatomidae (3.29%) < Ichneumonidae (2.37%) < Syrphidae (2.33%) < Vespidae (1.81%) < Asilidae (1.79%) < Geocoridae (0.89%). Coccinellidae, Tachinidae, Braconidae, Chrysopidae, Chalcididae, and Aphelinidae are the six major families that account for more than 85% of all recorded natural enemies. These six families have a higher percentage share in Phule Dhanwantary (90%) compared to the other genotypes. The conservation and better utilization of these natural enemies are crucial for the ecological and safe management of insect pests in the cotton ecosystem.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. DCD. Status paper of Indian cotton. Directorate of Cotton Development (DCD), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare (DAC & FW), Government of India, 1–211, https://www.nfsm.gov.in/StatusPaper/Cotton2016.pdf (2017).
2. ICAC Data portal; Production of cotton lint in ‘000 metric tonnes. International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC). Washington, USA (2019/20). https://www.icac.org/DataPortal/DataPortal?Year=2021/22%20proj.
3. Krishna, V. V. & Qaim, M. Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India. Agric. Syst. 107, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.005 (2012).
4. Sharma, H. C. & Pampapathy, G. Influence of transgenic cotton on the relative abundance and damage by target and non-target insect pests under different protection regimes in India. J. Crop Prot. 25(8), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.11.002 (2006).
5. Kranthi, K. R. & Stone, G. D. Long-term impacts of Bt cotton in India. Nat. Plants 6(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0750-z (2020).