A standardized flow cytometry network study for the assessment of circulating endothelial cell physiological ranges
-
Published:2018-04-11
Issue:1
Volume:8
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Lanuti Paola, Simeone Pasquale, Rotta Gianluca, Almici CamilloORCID, Avvisati Giuseppe, Azzaro Rosa, Bologna Giuseppina, Budillon Alfredo, Di Cerbo Melania, Di Gennaro Elena, Di Martino Maria Luisa, Diodato Annamaria, Doretto Paolo, Ercolino Eva, Falda Alessandra, Gregorj Chiara, Leone Alessandra, Losa Francesca, Malara Natalia, Marini Mirella, Mastroroberto Pasquale, Mollace Vincenzo, Morelli Michele, Muggianu Emma, Musolino Giuseppe, Neva Arabella, Pierdomenico Laura, Pinna Silvia, Piovani Giovanna, Roca Maria Serena, Russo Domenico, Scotti Lorenza, Tirindelli Maria Cristina, Trunzo Valentina, Venturella Roberta, Vitagliano Carlo, Zullo Fulvio, Marchisio Marco, Miscia Sebastiano
Abstract
AbstractCirculating endothelial cells (CEC) represent a restricted peripheral blood (PB) cell subpopulation with high potential diagnostic value in many endothelium-involving diseases. However, whereas the interest in CEC studies has grown, the standardization level of their detection has not. Here, we undertook the task to align CEC phenotypes and counts, by standardizing a novel flow cytometry approach, within a network of six laboratories. CEC were identified as alive/nucleated/CD45negative/CD34bright/CD146positive events and enumerated in 269 healthy PB samples. Standardization was demonstrated by the achievement of low inter-laboratory Coefficients of Variation (CVL), calculated on the basis of Median Fluorescence Intensity values of the most stable antigens that allowed CEC identification and count (CVL of CD34bright on CEC ~ 30%; CVL of CD45 on Lymphocytes ~ 20%). By aggregating data acquired from all sites, CEC numbers in the healthy population were captured (medianfemale = 9.31 CEC/mL; medianmale = 11.55 CEC/mL). CEC count biological variability and method specificity were finally assessed. Results, obtained on a large population of donors, demonstrate that the established procedure might be adopted as standardized method for CEC analysis in clinical and in research settings, providing a CEC physiological baseline range, useful as starting point for their clinical monitoring in endothelial dysfunctions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Hill, J. M. et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 593–600 (2003). 2. Chong, A. Y. et al. Endothelial dysfunction and damage in congestive heart failure: relation of flow-mediated dilation to circulating endothelial cells, plasma indexes of endothelial damage, and brain natriuretic peptide. Circulation 110, 1794–8 (2004). 3. Fadini, G. P., Losordo, D. & Dimmeler, S. Critical reevaluation of endothelial progenitor cell phenotypes for therapeutic and diagnostic use. Circ. Res. 110, 624–37 (2012). 4. Almici, C. et al. Changes in circulating endothelial cells count could become a valuable tool in the diagnostic definition of acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 98, 706–12 (2014). 5. Danova, M., Comolli, G., Manzoni, M., Torchio, M. & Mazzini, G. Flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitors for clinical purposes in oncology: A critical evaluation. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 4, 909–917 (2016).
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|