Comparing laser speckle contrast imaging and indocyanine green angiography for assessment of parathyroid perfusion

Author:

Mannoh Emmanuel A.,Baregamian Naira,Thomas Giju,Solόrzano Carmen C.,Mahadevan-Jansen Anita

Abstract

AbstractAccurate intraoperative assessment of parathyroid blood flow is crucial to preserve function postoperatively. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has been successfully employed, however its conventional application has limitations. A label-free method overcomes these limitations, and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is one such method that can accurately detect and quantify differences in parathyroid perfusion. In this study, twenty-one patients undergoing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy were recruited to compare LSCI and ICG fluorescence intraoperatively. An experimental imaging device was used to image a total of 37 parathyroid glands. Scores of 0, 1 or 2 were assigned for ICG fluorescence by three observers based on perceived intensity: 0 for little to no fluorescence, 1 for moderate or patchy fluorescence, and 2 for strong fluorescence. Speckle contrast values were grouped according to these scores. Analyses of variance were performed to detect significant differences between groups. Lastly, ICG fluorescence intensity was calculated for each parathyroid gland and compared with speckle contrast in a linear regression. Results showed significant differences in speckle contrast between groups such that parathyroids with ICG score 0 had higher speckle contrast than those assigned ICG score 1, which in turn had higher speckle contrast than those assigned ICG score 2. This was further supported by a correlation coefficient of -0.81 between mean-normalized ICG fluorescence intensity and speckle contrast. This suggests that ICG angiography and LSCI detect similar differences in blood flow to parathyroid glands. Laser speckle contrast imaging shows promise as a label-free alternative that overcomes current limitations of ICG angiography for parathyroid assessment.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3