Experimental proof that multivariate patterns among muscle attachments (entheses) can reflect repetitive muscle use

Author:

Karakostis Fotios AlexandrosORCID,Jeffery Nathan,Harvati Katerina

Abstract

Abstract Reconstructions of habitual activity in past populations and extinct human groups is a primary goal of paleoanthropological research. Muscle attachment scars (entheses) are widely considered as indicators of habitual activity and many attempts have been made to use them for this purpose. However, their interpretation remains equivocal due to methodological limitations and a paucity of empirical data supporting an interaction between systematic muscle forces and entheseal morphology. We have recently addressed the first issue with precise three-dimensional measuring protocols and rigorous multivariate analysis focusing on the patterns among different entheses rather than comparing each entheseal structure separately. In a previous study, the resulting entheseal correlations reflected synergistic muscle groups that separated individuals according to their lifelong occupational activities. Here we address the second issue by applying this methodology to existing micro-computed tomography data from rats that have undergone muscle stimulation under experimental conditions. In contrast to previous animal studies, we relied on blind analytical procedures across two research institutions and controlled for most factors of interindividual variability. Results demonstrated that the multivariate associations among different entheseal surfaces can directly reflect repetitive muscle recruitment and provide essential information on muscle use.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference38 articles.

1. Benjamin, M., Evans, E. J. & Copp, L. The histology of tendon attachments to bone in man. J. Anat. 149, 89–100 (1986).

2. Benjamin, M. et al. Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load. J. Anat. 208, 471–490 (2006).

3. Pearson, O. M., Cordero, R. M. & Busby, A. M. Neanderthals’ habitual activities in Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches And Perspectives (eds. Harvati, K., Harrison, T.) 135–156 (Springer, New York, 2006).

4. Foster, A., Buckley, H. & Tayles, N. Using entheses robusticity to infer activity in the past: A review. J. Archaeol. Method. Theory 21, 511–533 (2012).

5. Henderson, C. Y. et al. The new Coimbra method for recording entheseal changes and the effect of age-at-death. BMSAP 29, 140–149 (2017).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3