Author:
Stoops Anastasia,Montag Jessica L.
Abstract
AbstractLinguistic experience plays a clear role in accounting for variability in sentence comprehension behavior across individuals and across sentence types. We aimed to understand how individual differences in reading experience predict reading behavior. Corpus analyses revealed the frequencies with which our experimental items appeared in written and spoken language. We hypothesized that reading experience should affect sentence comprehension most substantially for sentence types that individuals primarily encounter through written language. Readers with more text exposure were faster and more accurate readers overall, but they read sentence types biased to written language particularly faster than did readers with less text exposure. We see clear effects of text exposure on sentence comprehension in ways that allow explicit links between written and spoken corpus statistics and behavior. We discuss theoretical implications of effects of text exposure for experience-based approaches to sentence processing.
Funder
National Science Foundation (NSF), United States
James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference103 articles.
1. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol. Rev. 101(4), 676 (1994).
2. Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. Toward a Lexicalist Framework of Constraint-Based Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution (Psychology Press, 1994).
3. MacDonald, M. C. How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Front. Psychol. 4, 226 (2013).
4. Hahn, M., Futrell, R., Levy, R. & Gibson, E. A resource-rational model of human processing of recursive linguistic structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119(43), e2122602119 (2022).
5. Huettig, F. Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Res. 1626, 118–135 (2015).