Author:
Raju ,Loy Chee Wah,Cho Kiho,Farrar Paul,Prusty B. Gangadhara
Abstract
AbstractFibre-reinforced biocomposites usage has gained prominence over the past decade. Although higher fracture toughness was observed when fibres were added to biocomposites, material degradation could occur due to filler and fibre content intolerance in the biocomposite matrix. Optimisation of resin-fibre-filler ratios helps in increasing the tribological performance of high load-bearing applications. However, the tribological performance is less understood due to limited in-vitro studies on the effect of fibre microstructures. A comprehensive investigation of the reciprocating and rotary wear behaviour of different compositions was carried out by varying fibre (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%) to particulate filler (40%, 45%, 50%, and 55%) weight fractions. The investigation aimed to identify the optimal composition of fibre-reinforced biocomposites based on the in-vitro ball-on-disc reciprocating and rotary wear tests in the presence of modified Fusayama solution. The cross-sectional areas of wear tracks were analysed using laser microscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques to assess the surface morphology and subsurface damage of the wear tracks on biocomposites and the antagonist. The numerical results were statistically analysed using two-way ANOVA followed by a posthoc Tukey’s test (p = 0.05). The results showed a combination of adhesive, abrasive and fatigue wear for all the tested Groups. The friction coefficient had a longer transient period for the 5 wt% and 10 wt% Groups. Based on the surface roughness, coefficient of friction, SEMs, specific wear rate, and ease of manufacturing, the threshold limit for fibre loading was found to be 10 wt%. The rotary test had a considerably lower specific wear rate compared to the reciprocating test. Fibre weight fraction was found to be the influencing factor of the abrasive wear behaviour compared to fibre length for the tested Groups.
Funder
Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Australian Government
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Hench, L. L. Bioceramics: From concept to clinic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1487–1510 (1991).
2. Idumah, C. I. Progress in polymer nanocomposites for bone regeneration and engineering. Polym. Polym. Compos. 29, 509–527 (2020).
3. Tithito, T. et al. Fabrication of biocomposite scaffolds made with modified hydroxyapatite inclusion of chitosan-grafted-poly(methyl methacrylate) for bone tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 14, 025013 (2019).
4. Kim, S. H. & Watts, D. C. Effect of glass-fiber reinforcement and water storage on fracture toughness (KIC) of polymer-based provisional crown and FPD materials. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17, 318–322 (2004).
5. Chukov, D. I. et al. Investigation of structure, mechanical and tribological properties of short carbon fiber reinforced UHMWPE-matrix composites. Compos. B Eng. 76, 79–88 (2015).