Author:
Arteche-López A.,Ávila-Fernández A.,Riveiro Álvarez R.,Almoguera B.,Bustamante Aragonés A.,Martin-Merida I.,López Martínez M. A.,Giménez Pardo A.,Vélez-Monsalve C.,Gallego Merlo J.,García Vara I.,Blanco-Kelly F.,Tahsin Swafiri S.,Lorda Sánchez I.,Trujillo Tiebas M. J.,Ayuso C.
Abstract
AbstractNowadays, exome sequencing is a robust and cost-efficient genetic diagnostic tool already implemented in many clinical laboratories. Despite it has undoubtedly improved our diagnostic capacity and has allowed the discovery of many new Mendelian-disease genes, it only provides a molecular diagnosis in up to 25–30% of cases. Here, we comprehensively evaluate the results of a large sample set of 4974 clinical exomes performed in our laboratory over a period of 5 years, showing a global diagnostic rate of 24.62% (1391/4974). For the evaluation we establish different groups of diseases and demonstrate how the diagnostic rate is not only dependent on the analyzed group of diseases (43.12% in ophthalmological cases vs 16.61% in neurological cases) but on the specific disorder (47.49% in retinal dystrophies vs 24.02% in optic atrophy; 18.88% in neuropathies/paraparesias vs 11.43% in dementias). We also detail the most frequent mutated genes within each group of disorders and discuss, on our experience, further investigations and directions needed for the benefit of patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC