Machine learning enabled subgroup analysis with real-world data to inform clinical trial eligibility criteria design

Author:

Xu Jie,Zhang Hao,Zhang Hansi,Bian Jiang,Wang Fei

Abstract

AbstractOverly restrictive eligibility criteria for clinical trials may limit the generalizability of the trial results to their target real-world patient populations. We developed a novel machine learning approach using large collections of real-world data (RWD) to better inform clinical trial eligibility criteria design. We extracted patients’ clinical events from electronic health records (EHRs), which include demographics, diagnoses, and drugs, and assumed certain compositions of these clinical events within an individual’s EHRs can determine the subphenotypes—homogeneous clusters of patients, where patients within each subgroup share similar clinical characteristics. We introduced an outcome-guided probabilistic model to identify those subphenotypes, such that the patients within the same subgroup not only share similar clinical characteristics but also at similar risk levels of encountering severe adverse events (SAEs). We evaluated our algorithm on two previously conducted clinical trials with EHRs from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Our model can clearly identify the patient subgroups who are more likely to suffer or not suffer from SAEs as subphenotypes in a transparent and interpretable way. Our approach identified a set of clinical topics and derived novel patient representations based on them. Each clinical topic represents a certain clinical event composition pattern learned from the patient EHRs. Tested on both trials, patient subgroup (#SAE=0) and patient subgroup (#SAE>0) can be well-separated by k-means clustering using the inferred topics. The inferred topics characterized as likely to align with the patient subgroup (#SAE>0) revealed meaningful combinations of clinical features and can provide data-driven recommendations for refining the exclusion criteria of clinical trials. The proposed supervised topic modeling approach can infer the clinical topics from the subphenotypes with or without SAEs. The potential rules for describing the patient subgroups with SAEs can be further derived to inform the design of clinical trial eligibility criteria.

Funder

NSF

NIH

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference44 articles.

1. Collins, F. S. The Importance of Clinical Trials. NIH MedlinePlushttps://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/about-nih/nih-director/articles/collins/importance-of-clinical-trials.pdf (2011). Accessed Sep 15, 2020.

2. Rothwell, P. M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: To whom do the results of this trial apply?. Lancet 365, 82–93 (2005).

3. Smits, M. et al. Exploring the causes of adverse events in hospitals and potential prevention strategies. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19, e5–e5 (2010).

4. Ory, M. et al. Screening, safety, and adverse events in physical activity interventions: Collaborative experiences from the behavior change consortium. Ann. Behav. Med. 29, 20–28 (2005).

5. Li, Q. et al. Assessing the validity of aa priori patient-trial generalizability score using real-world data from a large clinical data research network: a colorectal cancer clinical trial case study. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2019, 1101 (American Medical Informatics Association, 2019).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3