Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis

Abstract

AbstractNowadays, several configurations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants are commercially available whose designs resulted from clinical and biomechanical considerations. Previous research activities led to the development of the so-called medial-pivot (MP) design. However, the actual benefits of the MP, with respect to other prosthesis designs, are still not well understood. The present work compares the impact of two insert geometries, namely the ultra-congruent (UC) and medial-pivot (MP), on the biomechanical behaviour of a bicondylar total knee endoprosthesis. For this purpose, a multibody model of a lower limb was created alternatively integrating the two implants having the insert geometry discretized. Joint dynamics and contact pressure distributions were evaluated by simulating a squat motion. Results showed a similar tibial internal rotation range of about 3.5°, but an early rotation occurs for the MP design. Furthermore, the discretization of the insert geometry allowed to efficiently derive the contact pressure distributions, directly within the multibody simulation framework, reporting peak pressure values of 33 MPa and 20 MPa for the UC and MP, respectively. Clinically, the presented findings confirm the possibility, through a MP design, to achieve a more natural joint kinematics, consequently improving the post-operative patient satisfaction and potentially reducing the occurrence of phenomena leading to the insert loosening.