Author:
Paterson Emilie A.,O’Malley Carly I.,Moody Carly,Vogel Susan,Authier Simon,Turner Patricia V.
Abstract
AbstractCynomolgus macaques may undergo surgical procedures for scientific and veterinary purposes. Recognition and assessment of pain using validated tools is a necessary first step for adequately managing pain in these primates. Grimace scales are one means of assessing the occurance of acute pain using action units such as facial expressions and posture. The aim of this study was to create and validate a Cynomolgus Macaque Grimace Scale (CMGS). Cynomolgus macaques (n = 43) were video recorded before and after a surgical procedure. Images were extracted from videos at timepoints at which breakthrough pain might be expected based on analgesic pharmacokinetics. Using the CMGS images were scored by 12 observers blinded to animal identification, times, and conditions. To validate the tool, detailed behavioral analyses emphasizing changes to baseline activity ethograms were compared to grimace scores. Four action units were identified related to potential pain including orbital tightening, brow lowering, cheek tightening, and hunched posture. The CMGS tool was found to have moderate inter- (ICCaverage action unit mean ± SD: 0.67 ± 0.28) and good intra- (ICCsingle mean ± SD: 0.79 ± 0.14) observer reliability. Grimace scores increased significantly (p < 0.0001) in the first four post-operative timepoints compared to baseline, correlating with behavioral findings (rho range = 0.22–0.35, p < 0.001). An analgesic intervention threshold was determined and should be considered when providing additional pain relief. The CMGS was shown to be a reliable and valid tool; however, more research is needed to confirm external validity. This tool will be highly valuable for refining analgesic protocols and acute peri-procedural care for cynomolgus macaques.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Tardif, S. D., Coleman, K., Hobbs, T. R. & Lutz, C. IACUC Review of nonhuman primate research. ILAR J. 54(2), 234–245 (2013).
2. CCAC. CCAC guidelines: Nonhuman primates. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada (2019).
3. Carbone, L. & Austin, J. Pain and laboratory animals: Publication practices for better data reproducibility and better animal welfare. PLoS ONE 11(5), e0155001 (2016).
4. Peterson, N. C., Nunamaker, E. A. & Turner, P. V. To treat or not to treat: The effects of pain on experimental parameters. Comp. Med. 67(6), 469–482 (2017).
5. Stokes, E. L., Flecknell, P. A. & Richardson, C. A. Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to rodents undergoing experimental surgical procedures. Lab. Anim. (UK) 43(2), 149–154 (2009).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献