Author:
Hildenbrand A.,Marques F. O.,Pereira A.,Nomade S.,Hevia-Cruz F.
Abstract
AbstractLarge-scale flank collapses are one of the main hazards associated with the evolution of volcanic islands. Precisely dating such events is critical to evaluate the frequency of destabilization episodes and further assess the triggering mechanism(s) associated with internal and/or external factors, such as volcano dynamics, regional tectonics, and global paleoclimatic changes. Here, we constrain the age of a pumice-rich pyroclastic deposit exposed on the eastern flank of Flores Island (Azores), which we interpret as a co-blast deposit generated by a major flank collapse that destroyed the whole western flank of the former volcanic edifice. Twelve single-grain 40Ar/39Ar analyses, performed on 250–500 µm anorthoclase feldspars (mean K/Ca close to 5) with our high-sensitivity multi-collector NGX mass spectrometer, provide a robust weighted mean age of 1.32 ± 0.01 Ma for this eruption. This new age is consistent with previous K/Ar data bracketing the flank collapse between 1.30 ± 0.04 and 1.18 ± 0.09 Ma, and indicates that this event occurred at the end of the main construction phase of the volcano. The explosion produced pumice-rich layers preceded by a lahar as attested by a polygenetic mudflow deposit underlying the dated deposit. From the geochemistry of lavas erupted just before and after the collapse, we speculate upon the possible role of magmatic processes on flank destabilization. We propose a first hypothesis where differentiation in a shallow magma reservoir could have favored edifice inflation, ground shaking, and flank failure, triggering a decompression-induced violent eruption. Overall, our study shows that high-sensitivity mass spectrometers have now reached analytical performances allowing to measure precisely and accurately ages on relatively small and moderately K-rich single feldspars, which is of the utmost importance for dating heterogeneous blasts and tephra deposits that may have been induced by large-scale flank collapses during the late Quaternary.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Moore, J. G., Normak, W. R. & Holcomb, R. T. Giant Hawaiian landslides. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 22, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.22.050194.001003 (1994).
2. Clague, D. A., Sherrod, D. R. Growth and degradation of Hawaiian volcanoes, chap. 3 of Poland. In Characteristics of Hawaiian volcanoes: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, vol. 1801 (eds. Takahashi, T. J., and Landowski, C. M.) 97–146. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp18013 (2014).
3. Denlinger, R. P., and Morgan, J. K. Instability of Hawaiian volcanoes, chap. 4 of Poland. In Characteristics of Hawaiian volcanoes: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, vol. 1801 (eds. Takahashi, T. J., and Landowski, C. M.) 149–176. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp18014 (2014).
4. Navarro, J. M., Coello, J. (1989) Depressions originated by landslide processes inTenerife, paper presented at ESF Meeting on Canadan Volcanism, Eur. Space Found., La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain.
5. Navarro, J. M. & Coello, J. Sucesion de episodios en la evolucion geo1ogica de La Palma, Mapa geologico de La Palma (Inst. Nac. Para la Conserv. de la Nat, 1993).