Multi-centric evaluation of Truenat MTB and MTB-RIF Dx assays for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis
-
Published:2024-07-08
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Singh Urvashi B.,Singh Manjula,Rodrigues Camilla,Christopher D. J.,Mahajan Neeraj,Srivastav Abhinav,Singh Kh Jitenkumar,Kanswal Sunita,Rao M. V. V.,kazi Mubin,Sawant Damini,Thangakunam Balamugesh,Vijay Coelho Victor,Shankar Deepa,Bhatnagar Anuj,Mohan Anant,Ahuja Vineet
Abstract
AbstractExtra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) is difficult to diagnose due to paucibacillary nature of disease. Current study evaluated accuracy of Truenat MTB and MTB-Rif Dx (TN), for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin. Samples were collected from 2103 treatment naive adults with presumptive EPTB, and tested by smear microscopy, liquid culture (LC) (MGIT-960) and GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GX) (Microbiological Reference Standards, MRS). TN results were compared to MRS and Composite Reference Standards (CRS, Microbiology, histopathology, radiology, clinical features prompting decision to treat, response to treatment). CRS grouped patients into 551 confirmed, 1096 unconfirmed, and 409 as unlikely TB. TN sensitivity and specificity was 73.7% and 90.4% against GX. Against LC, Overall sensitivity of GX was 67.6%, while that of TN was 62.3%. Highest sensitivity by TN was observed in pus samples (89%) and highest specificity (92%) in CSF samples, similar to GX. TN sensitivity was better in fluid and biopsy samples and slightly inferior for lymph node aspirates compared to GX. TN sensitivity for RIF resistance detection was slightly superior to GX. TN and GX results were further compared to Clinical Reference Standards. TN detected 170 TB patients initiated on treatment missed by GX, while GX detected 113 such patients missed by TN. Of 124 samples with RIF resistance discordance between GX and TN, GX reported 103/124 as sensitive, 3/124 as indeterminate and 18 as resistant (13/18 samples had low/very low DNA load) while TN reported RIF resistance indeterminate in 103/111 low/very low DNA load samples. Due to paucibacillary nature of EPTB samples, culture yield was poor and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing failed to resolve the discordance. The study establishes TN at par with GX and can be utilized for quick and accurate diagnosis of EPTB.
Funder
Indian Council of Medical Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021. 7–9 (2021). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2017. 69 (2017). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259366
3. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control, WHO report 2001, WHO/CDS/TB/2001.287. Communicable Diseases, World Health Organisation, Geneva. p8–34 (2001). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/63835/WHO_CDS_TB_2001.287.pdf
4. Jørstad, M. D. et al. Evaluation of treatment response in extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a low-resource setting. BMC Infect. Dis. 19, 426 (2019).
5. Kent PT, Kubica GP, editors. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the Level III laboratory. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control (1985).