Author:
Oezkur Mehmet,Reda Sara,Rühl Heiko,Theuerkauf Nils,Kreyer Stefan,Duerr Georg Daniel,Charitos Efstratios,Silaschi Miriam,Medina Marta,Zimmer Sebastian,Putensen Christian,Treede Hendrik
Abstract
AbstractAxial flow pumps are standard treatment in cases of cardiogenic shock and high-risk interventions in cardiology and cardiac surgery, although the optimal anticoagulation strategy remains unclear. We evaluated whether laboratory findings could predict bleeding complications and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (avWS) among patients who were treated using axial flow pumps. We retrospectively evaluated 60 consecutive patients who received Impella devices (Impella RP: n = 20, Impella CP/5.0: n = 40; Abiomed Inc., Danvers, USA) between January 2019 and December 2020. Thirty-two patients (53.3%) experienced major or fatal bleeding complications (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium score of > 3) despite intravenous heparin being used to maintain normal activated partial thromboplastin times (40–50 s). Extensive testing was performed for 28 patients with bleeding complications (87.5%). Relative to patients with left ventricular support, patients with right ventricular support were less likely to develop avWS (87.5% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.035). Bleeding was significantly associated with avWS (odds ratio [OR]: 20.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3–128.5; p = 0.001) and treatment duration (OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.09–1.55; p = 0.003). Patients with avWS had longer Impella treatment than patients without avWS (2 days [1–4.7 days] vs. 7.3 days [3.2–13.0 days]). Bleeding complications during Impella support were associated with avWS in our cohort, while aPTT monitoring was not sufficient to prevent bleeding complications. A more targeted anticoagulation monitoring might be needed for patients who receive Impella devices.
Funder
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Pesarini, G., Gratta, A., Dolci, G., Lunardi, M. & Ribichini, F. L. Impella-protected PCI: The clinical results achieved so far. Minerva Cardioangiol. 66, 612–618 (2018).
2. Anderson, M. B. et al. Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: The prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 34, 1549–1560 (2015).
3. Dalal, P. K., Mertens, A., Shah, D. & Hanson, I. Hemodynamic support using percutaneous transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for refractory cardiogenic shock. Case Rep. Cardiol. 2019, 4591250 (2019).
4. Jensen, P. B. et al. Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 7, 53–61 (2018).
5. Pappalardo, F. et al. Concomitant implantation of Impella((R)) on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 19, 404–412 (2017).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献