Author:
Wright Daniel Nilsen,Züchner Mark,Annavini Eis,Escalona Manuel J.,Hammerlund Teige Lena,Whist Tvedt Lars Geir,Lervik Andreas,Haga Henning A.,Guiho Thomas,Clausen Ingelin,Glott Thomas,Boulland Jean-Luc
Abstract
AbstractPressure monitoring in various organs of the body is essential for appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. In almost all situations, monitoring is performed in a hospital setting. Technological advances not only promise to improve clinical pressure monitoring systems, but also engage toward the development of fully implantable systems in ambulatory patients. Such systems would not only provide longitudinal time monitoring to healthcare personnel, but also to the patient who could adjust their way-of-life in response to the measurements. In the past years, we have developed a new type of piezoresistive pressure sensor system. Different bench tests have demonstrated that it delivers precise and reliable pressure measurements in real-time. The potential of this system was confirmed by a continuous recording in a patient that lasted for almost a day. In the present study, we further characterized the functionality of this sensor system by conducting in vivo implantation experiments in nine female farm pigs. To get a step closer to a fully implantable system, we also adapted two different wireless communication solutions to the sensor system. The communication protocols are based on MICS (Medical Implant Communication System) and BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) communication. As a proof-of-concept, implantation experiments in nine female pigs demonstrated the functionality of both systems, with a notable technical superiority of the BLE.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Veletić, M. et al. Implants with sensing capabilities. Chem. Rev. 122, 16329–16363 (2022).
2. Whitesides, T. E., Haney, T. C., Harada, H., Holmes, H. E. & Morimoto, K. A simple method for tissue pressure determination. Arch. Surg. 110, 1311–1313 (1975).
3. Baines, G., Da-Silva, A. S., Araklitis, G., Robinson, D. & Cardozo, L. Recent advances in urodynamics in women. F1000Res 9, 666 (2020).
4. Lotze, P. M. A comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients. Curr. Urol. Rep. 6, 326–334 (2005).
5. Hundley, A. F. & Visco, A. G. Comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers. Int. Urogynecol. J. 15, 276–280 (2004).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献