Author:
Kaur Jashanjot,Prusty A. K.,Ravisankar N.,Panwar A. S.,Shamim M.,Walia S. S.,Chatterjee S.,Pasha M. L.,Babu Subhash,Jat M. L.,López-Ridaura Santiago,Groot Jeroen C. J.,Toorop Roos Adelhart,Barba-Escoto Luis,Noopur Kohima,Kashyap Poonam
Abstract
AbstractDue to complexity of smallholder farms, many times technologies with great potential fail to achieve the desired impact in leveraging productivity and profitability of the farming community. In the Indo-Gangetic Plains there is an urgent need to understand the diversity of farm households, identifying the main drivers deciding their system thus, classifying them into homogenous groups. In the present study, the diversity of smallholder farms was assessed using crop, livestock and income related characteristics and associated farm mechanization. Using principal component analysis and cluster analysis for 252 farm households, 4 farm types were identified i.e. Type 1. Small Farm households with cereal-based cropping system and subsistence livestock (39%), Type 2. Small Farm households with diversified cropping system dominated by cereal and fodder crops with only cattle herd (9%), Type 3. Marginal Farm household with diversified cropping system dominated by cash crop and herd comprising of only cattle (39%), Type 4. Marginal Farm household with diversified cropping system dominated by cereal crops and herd dominated by small ruminants (12%). Based on the constraints identified for different components of farming systems, low-cost interventions were planned for each farm type. These interventions have resulted in 84.8–103.2 per cent increase in the income of the farm HH under study suggesting usefulness of typology-based intervention planning in increasing income of small farm holders.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Govt of India. Agricultural statistics at a glance, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Govt. of India, New Delhi (2014).
2. Goswami, R., Chatterjee, S. & Prasad, B. Farm types and their economic characterization in complex agro-ecosystems for informed extension intervention: Study from coastal West Bengal, India. Agric. Food Econ. 2, 1–24 (2014).
3. Pingali P., Aiyar A., Abraham M. & Rahman A. Agricultural Technology for Increasing Competitiveness of Small Holders. In Transforming Food Systems for a Rising India. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14409-8_9 (2019).
4. Singh, R. B. Environmental consequences of agricultural development: A case study from the Green Revolution state of Haryana, India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 82(1–3), 97–103 (2000).
5. Kumar, S. et al. Integrated farming system in India: Current status, scope and future prospects in changing agricultural scenario. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 88(11), 1661–1675 (2018).
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献