Author:
Haghighatdoost Fahimeh,Mohammadifard Noushin,Zakeri Parisa,Najafian Jamshid,Sadeghi Masoumeh,Roohafza Hamidreza,Sarrafzadegan Nizal
Abstract
AbstractThe relationship between protein intake and mortality is still controversial. We prospectively examined the associations of dietary protein sources with all-cause mortality risk in the Isfahan cohort study (ICS). A total of 5431 participants, aged ≥ 35 years, were enrolled in the ICS, in 2001 and followed through 2013. The frequency of protein intakes from different sources was estimated through a validated food frequency questionnaire at baseline. Any new case of death was recorded over the follow-up duration. Hazard ratio (HR)s and 95% confidence interval (CI)s were estimated through Cox proportional hazards regression models. During a median follow-up of 11.3 years, 483 deaths were documented. Higher intakes of plant proteins (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.46, 0.91) and animal proteins (HR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.13, 2.05) were associated with a decreased and increased risk of mortality, respectively. Additional adjustment for some mediators did not considerably affect the associations for animal protein (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.15, 2.09), whereas led to a tendency towards lower risk for plant protein in the top quintile compared with the bottom one (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48, 0.95; P trend = 0.06). Among specific major sources, higher intakes of nuts and fish were associated with a 27% (95% CI 0.58, 0.93) and 21% (95% CI 0.62, 1.01) lower risk of mortality, respectively. The inverse association between plant protein and mortality risk might be mediated by some metabolic disorders. However, our results suggest an independent positive association for animal protein and all-cause mortality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015(385), 117–171 (2014).
2. Wycherley, T. P., Moran, L. J., Clifton, P. M., Noakes, M. & Brinkworth, G. D. Effects of energy-restricted high-protein, low-fat compared with standard-protein, low-fat diets: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 96(6), 1281–1298 (2012).
3. Rutherfurd-Markwick, K. J. Food proteins as a source of bioactive peptides with diverse functions. Br. J. Nutr. 108(Suppl 2), S149–S157 (2012).
4. Fan, M., Li, Y., Wang, C., Mao, Z., Zhou, W., Zhang, L., et al. Dietary protein consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: ADose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrients. 11(11) (2019).
5. Viguiliouk, E. et al. Effect of replacing animal protein with plant protein on glycemic control in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 7(12), 9804–9824 (2015).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献