Improving consumer understanding of pesticide toxicity labels: experimental evidence

Author:

Hosni Hanin,Segovia Michelle,Zhao Shuoli,Palma Marco A.,Skevas Theodoros

Abstract

AbstractConsumers often inadvertently misperceive the health hazards associated with over-the-counter pesticides under the current textual labeling policy, potentially leading to improper use. We conducted an incentivized framed field experiment with eye tracking to evaluate the effectiveness of the current pesticide labels that convey risk using signal words (Caution, Warning, Danger) compared to two visually focused label alternatives: traffic light colors and skull intensity symbols. A total of 166 participants were randomly assigned to one of three label formats and asked to rank toxicity levels and make purchasing decisions within multiple price lists. Results show that signal words fail to adequately communicate toxicity levels. Specifically, participants’ correct assessment of toxicity level dramatically improves from 54% under the existing signal word label to 95% under the traffic light and 83% under the skull intensity symbol labels. We also find that participants are more likely to choose the less toxic alternatives under the new labels, suggesting the current labeling system may affect choice and have unintended adverse effects on human health.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Merchant, M. Understanding common house and garden insecticides. Texas A&M Extension. https://citybugs.tamu.edu/factsheets/ipm/ent-4002/ (2016).

2. Atwood, D., & Paisley-Jones, C. Pesticides industry sales and usage: 2008–2012 market estimates. US Environmental Protection Agency (2017).

3. Skevas, T., Stefanou, S. E. & Lansink, A. O. Do farmers internalise environmental spillovers of pesticides in production?. J. Agric. Econ. 64(3), 624–640 (2013).

4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Some organophosphate insecticides and herbicides: Diazinon, glyphosate, malathion, parathion, and tetrachlorvinphos. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 112 (2015).

5. Guyton, K. Z. et al. Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate. Lancet Oncol. 16(5), 490–491 (2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3