BMP2 rs1005464 is associated with mandibular condyle size variation
-
Published:2024-03-12
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Marañón-Vásquez Guido Artemio,de Souza Araújo Mônica Tirre,de Oliveira Ruellas Antônio Carlos,Matsumoto Mírian Aiko Nakane,Figueiredo Marcio,Meyfarth Sandra Regina Santos,Antunes Lívia Azeredo Alves,Baratto-Filho Flares,Scariot Rafaela,Flores-Mir Carlos,Kirschneck Christian,Santos Antunes Leonardo,Küchler Erika Calvano
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in endochondral development-related genes and mandibular condyle shape, size, volume, and symmetry traits. Cone-beam Computed Tomographies and genomic DNA from 118 individuals were evaluated (age range: 15–66 years). Data from twelve 3D landmarks on mandibular condyles were submitted to morphometric analyses including Procrustes fit, principal component analysis, and estimation of centroid sizes and fluctuating asymmetry scores. Condylar volumes were additionally measured. Seven SNPs across BMP2, BMP4, RUNX2 and SMAD6 were genotyped. Linear models were fit to evaluate the effect of the SNPs on the mandibular condyles’ quantitative traits. Only the association between BMP2 rs1005464 and centroid size remained significant after adjusting to account for the false discovery rate due to multiple testing. Individuals carrying at least one A allele for this SNP showed larger condylar size than common homozygotes GG (β = 0.043; 95% CI: 0.014—0.071; P value = 0.028). The model including BMP2 rs1005464, age and sex of the participants explained 17% of the variation in condylar size. Shape, volume, and symmetry were not associated with the evaluated SNPs. These results suggest that BMP2 rs1005464 might be associated with variation in the mandibular condyles size.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Koski, K. Cranial growth centers: Facts or fallacies?. Am. J. Orthod. 54, 566–583 (1968).
2. Moss, M. L. & Rankow, R. M. The role of the functional matrix in mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 38, 95–103 (1968).
3. Petrovic, A. G. Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular condylar growth. Acta Morphol. Neerl. Scand. 10, 25–34 (1972).
4. Duterloo, H. S. & Wolters, J. M. Experiments on the significance of articular function as a stimulating chondrogenic factor for the growth of secondary cartilages of the rat mandible. Trans. Eur. Orthod. Soc. 103–115 (1971).
5. Hinton, R. J. Genes that regulate morphogenesis and growth of the temporomandibular joint: A review. Dev. Dyn. 243, 864–874 (2014).