Abstract
AbstractDespite their entertainment oriented purpose, social
media changed the way users access information, debate, and form
their opinions. Recent studies, indeed, showed that users online
tend to promote their favored narratives and thus to form polarized
groups around a common system of beliefs. Confirmation bias helps to
account for users’ decisions about whether to spread content, thus
creating informational cascades within identifiable communities. At
the same time, aggregation of favored information within those
communities reinforces selective exposure and group polarization.
Along this path, through a thorough quantitative analysis we
approach connectivity patterns of 1.2 M Facebook users engaged with
two very conflicting narratives: scientific and conspiracy news.
Analyzing such data, we quantitatively investigate the effect of two
mechanisms (namely challenge avoidance and reinforcement seeking)
behind confirmation bias, one of the major drivers of human behavior
in social media. We find that challenge avoidance mechanism triggers
the emergence of two distinct and polarized groups of users (i.e.,
echo chambers) who also tend to be surrounded by friends having
similar systems of beliefs. Through a network based approach, we
show how the reinforcement seeking mechanism limits the influence of
neighbors and primarily drives the selection and diffusion of
contents even among like-minded users, thus fostering the formation
of highly polarized sub-clusters within the same echo chamber.
Finally, we show that polarized users reinforce their preexisting
beliefs by leveraging the activity of their like-minded neighbors,
and this trend grows with the user engagement suggesting how peer
influence acts as a support for reinforcement seeking.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献