Author:
da Cunha Lais L.,Monteiro Hugo F.,Figueiredo Caio C.,Canisso Igor F.,Bicalho Rodrigo C.,Cardoso Felipe C.,Weimer Bart C.,Lima Fabio S.
Abstract
AbstractLess invasive rumen sampling methods, such as oro-esophageal tubing, became widely popular for exploring the rumen microbiome and metabolome. However, it remains unclear if such methods represent well the rumen contents from the rumen cannula technique. Herein, we characterized the microbiome and metabolome in the rumen content collected by an oro-esophageal tube and by rumen cannula in ten multiparous lactating Holstein cows. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Untargeted metabolome was characterized using gas chromatography of a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were the top three most abundant phyla representing ~ 90% of all samples. Although the pH of oro-esophageal samples was greater than rumen cannula, we found no difference in alpha and beta-diversity among their microbiomes. The overall metabolome of oro-esophageal samples was slightly different from rumen cannula samples yet more closely related to the rumen cannula content as a whole, including its fluid and particulate fractions. Enrichment pathway analysis revealed a few differences between sampling methods, such as when evaluating unsaturated fatty acid pathways in the rumen. The results of the current study suggest that oro-esophageal sampling can be a proxy to screen the 16S rRNA rumen microbiome compared to the rumen cannula technique. The variation introduced by the 16S rRNA methodology may be mitigated by oro-esophageal sampling and the possibility of increasing experimental units for a more consistent representation of the overall microbial population. Studies should consider an under or over-representation of metabolites and specific metabolic pathways depending on the sampling method.
Funder
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,United States
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Harfoot, C. G. Anatomy, physiology and microbiology of the ruminant digestive tract. Lipid Metab. Rumin. Anim. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-023789-3.50005-2 (1981).
2. McAllister, T. A., Bae, H. D., Jones, G. A. & Cheng, K. J. Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 3004–3018 (1994).
3. Hungate, R. E. The Rumen and Its Microbes (Academic Press, 1966).
4. Russell, J. B. Rumen Microbiology and Its Role in Ruminant Nutrition (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (ARS-USDA), 2022).
5. Saleem, F. et al. The bovine ruminal fluid metabolome. Metabolomics 9, 360–378 (2013).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献