Author:
Kłosowska-Chomiczewska Ilona E.,Macierzanka Adam,Parchem Karol,Miłosz Pamela,Bladowska Sonia,Płaczkowska Iga,Hewelt-Belka Weronika,Jungnickel Christian
Abstract
AbstractIn the growing landscape of interest in natural surfactants, selecting the appropriate one for specific applications remains challenging. The extensive, yet often unsystematized, knowledge of microbial surfactants, predominantly represented by rhamnolipids (RLs), typically does not translate beyond the conditions presented in scientific publications. This limitation stems from the numerous variables and their interdependencies that characterize microbial surfactant production. We hypothesized that a computational recipe for biosynthesizing RLs with targeted applicational properties could be developed from existing literature and experimental data. We amassed literature data on RL biosynthesis and micellar solubilization and augmented it with our experimental results on the solubilization of triglycerides (TGs), a topic underrepresented in current literature. Utilizing this data, we constructed mathematical models that can predict RL characteristics and solubilization efficiency, represented as logPRL = f(carbon and nitrogen source, parameters of biosynthesis) and logMSR = f(solubilizate, rhamnolipid (e.g. logPRL), parameters of solubilization), respectively. The models, characterized by robust R2 values of respectively 0.581–0.997 and 0.804, enabled the ranking of descriptors based on their significance and impact—positive or negative—on the predicted values. These models have been translated into ready-to-use calculators, tools designed to streamline the selection process for identifying a biosurfactant optimally suited for intended applications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference153 articles.
1. Özdemir, G. & Sezgin, Ö. Keratin–rhamnolipids and keratin–sodium dodecyl sulfate interactions at the air/water interface. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 52(1), 1–7 (2006).
2. L.-K. Ju, S. Dashtbozorg, N. Vongpanish, Wound dressings with enhanced gas permeation and other beneficial properties, Google Patents, (2016).
3. Kłosowska-Chomiczewska, I. E., Medrzycka, K. & Karpenko, E. Biosurfactants—biodegradability, toxicity, efficiency in comparison with synthetic surfactants, In Research and Application of New Technologies in Wastewater Treatment and Municipal Solid Waste Disposal in Ukraine, Sweden, and Poland, KTH/LWR/REPORT, Cracow, Poland, (eds. P.E. Levlin E.) 1–9 (2011).
4. Li, G. et al. Evaluation of biodegradability and biotoxicity of surfactants in soil. RSC Adv. 7(49), 31018–31026 (2017).
5. Eismin, R. J. et al. Evolution of aggregate structure in solutions of anionic monorhamnolipids: Experimental and computational results. Langmuir 33(30), 7412–7424 (2017).