Abstract
AbstractReablement is considered a complex intervention due to its multicomponent, person-centered, holistic approach promoting older adults’ active participation in daily activities. It is important to consider the unique context in which complex interventions are implemented, as contextual factors may interact and influence implementation outcomes. As part of the European TRANS-SENIOR project, this qualitative study aimed to gain insight into professionals’ experiences with reablement implementation in Dutch community care. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, four focus groups were conducted comprising 32 professionals. Two groups were formed: one at operational level, including therapists, nursing staff, social workers, and domestic support; and one at organizational/strategic level, including project leaders, managers, directors, municipality representatives and health insurers. Participating care organizations had at least 6 months of experience with deploying and implementing reablement. Findings reflected three themes: (1) strength of interdisciplinary collaboration; highlighting significance of sharing goals and beliefs, (2) integrating the reablement philosophy into the organization; underscoring managements role in fostering support across all organizational layers, and (3) achieving a culture change in the healthcare system; emphasizing current funding models impeding value-based care tailored to the individual’s goals and needs. The results offer valuable insights for implementation of complex interventions, like reablement.
Funder
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Beard, J. R. et al. The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet 387, 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 (2016).
2. Rostgaard, T. et al. Livindhome: Living Independently at Home: Reforms in Home Care in 9 European Countries (SFI - Danish National Centre for Social Research, 2011).
3. Forsyth, A. & Molinsky, J. What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate 31, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795 (2021).
4. Hatcher, D., Chang, E., Schmied, V. & Garrido, S. Exploring the perspectives of older people on the concept of home. J. Aging Res. 2019, 2679680. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2679680 (2019).
5. Haak, M., Fange, A., Iwarsson, S. & Ivanoff, S. D. Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: Experiences among very old Swedish people. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 14, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120601024929 (2007).